Follow SFS on social media!
Stay up to date on our activities, be the first to know about new events and ask questions to elected representatives.
Consultation response
SFS consultation response Proposal for regulations regarding two new subjects in the children's and leisure program etc.
SFS has no objections to the proposal. SFS does not believe that it would have any negative consequences for students in teacher education, Read the full…
SFS consultation response: Tightened requirements for citizenship (SOU 2025:1)
SFS rejects several of the proposals in the inquiry into stricter requirements for citizenship (SOU 2025:1). Among other things, it proposes a longer residence period, requirements for self-sufficiency and stricter requirements…
SFS consultation response: Better migration law rules for researchers and students (Ds 2024:31)
In summary, SFS is overall positive about the proposals for doctoral students and researchers, but overall negative about the proposals regarding students.
SFS consultation response: Subject knowledge and teaching skills – a reformed teacher education (SOU 2024:81)
SFS does not agree with the inquiry's proposal to introduce higher grade requirements for teacher and preschool teacher training. SFS also opposes the increased detailed control that the inquiry's proposal would entail for teacher training.
SFS consultation response: Certain measures for strengthened return operations and alien control (SOU 2024:80)
SFS recommends that neither healthcare, schools nor social services should be covered by the obligation to provide information. SFS believes that it is good that neither universities and colleges nor CSN are covered by the consultation's proposal.
SFS consultation response: A new law on research ethics requirements and ethical review of research involving humans (Ds 2024:21)
SFS is generally positive about the inquiry's proposals. The current ethics review legislation is cumbersome and negatively affects both doctoral students and researchers, and it is good that the inquiry proposes that some research should be exempted from ethics approval requirements and that penal provisions should be removed.
SFS consultation response: National support function for responsible internationalization – final report of a government assignment
SFS views the proposal for a national support function positively, but criticizes the lack of focus on education and student representation.
SFS consultation response: Proposal for changes to CSN's regulations and general advice on granting transition study support
SFS has been invited to submit its views on the referral of Proposals for amendments to CSN's regulations and general advice on granting…
SFS consultation response: Updated high-cost coverage – open healthcare and pharmaceuticals
SFS rejects the proposal to change the high-cost protection and to increase the amounts in the high-cost ladder, thereby allowing the patient to pay a higher out-of-pocket fee for…
SFS consultation response: UKÄ's project on the legal meaning of study interruptions
SFS generally agrees with the problem picture that Uppsala University presents in its request for a preliminary ruling. However, SFS makes a few additions regarding:…
SFS consultation response: UHR's Proposal to amend the Swedish Council for Universities' regulations (2022:2) on main areas in experimental activities with supplementary pedagogical education
SFS supports or has no objections to the proposals.
Load more referrals
Nothing left to charge.